Watch what happens when only three words are changed in a journal critique of the nefarious activities of the tobacco industry. Just three words (italicized) in the following paragraph were changed, replacing the words “tobacco,” “smoking,” and “addictive.”
“The vaccine industry had a playbook, a script, that emphasized personal responsibility, paying scientists who delivered research that instilled doubt, criticizing the “junk” science that found harms associated with vaccination, making self-regulatory pledges, lobbying with massive resources to stifle government action, introducing “safer” products, and simultaneously manipulating and denying both the harmful nature of their products and their marketing to children.”
[From “The Perils of Ignoring History: Big Tobacco Played Dirty and Millions Died. How Similar Is Big Food?” Milbank Quarterly journal of population health and public health policy, 2009.]
Which brings up the term “cigarette science” regarding vaccine safety. Decades ago, cigarette makers advertised heavily about “scientific studies” of their cigarettes in which two groups of people are compared “scientifically.” Here is their science: One group was given a certain brand of cigarette to smoke, while another group smoked the advertised brand. The result after 45 days was that the advertised brand (surprise!) was scientifically superior! To loud fanfare would come the “scientifically proven” claim that this brand of cigarettes was, “Your throat protection against irritation, against cough.”
Unbeknownst to most parents, vaccine makers use this same kind of counterfeit testing of vaccines right from the start. No actual placebo is ever used in vaccine “safety” testing. A comparison of adverse reactions is made between two groups of people, each injected with a different vaccine, or else one group receives the “tested” vaccine, while the other group receives an identical vaccine mixture except that the viral particles are missing. Either way, both groups are injected with a cocktail containing chemicals and metals that are toxic to the nerve system, plus cancer-causing chemicals. Since both groups end up having similar adverse reactions to the injections, a conclusion is reached that the group getting the vaccine group had the same response as the “placebo” group, and therefore it is safe. (Surprise!) What a joke. If a high school student tried to enter this kind of “science” in a science fair, they would immediately be disqualified. There is a precise word for this kind of “science”: fraud.
Do you suppose the vaccine companies are hiding something? Did they discover early on that actually comparing that the adverse responses of people receiving a vaccine are substantially worse that receiving no vaccine at all?
Wait, even our own government has so far failed to compare vaccinated and unvaccinated people. Is the government afraid of finding out that vaccines are not safe and effective as advertised?